Noticias de Latinoamï¿½rica y el mundo
Noticias en vivo
|Publicado el: 27/08/2011|
Pablo Guerrero: there was no coup but a riot that left police mishandled death
Pablo Guerrero, who was awarded the substitution of custody, self-proclaimed victim of political persecution and defends itself from underground. Guerrero is on trial for attack on state security for allegedly breaking public media on 30 September (30 S). Expected date and time for the adjudication hearing.6336 lecturas.
Is the ongoing trial against him is in effect because it failed to prove his innocence?
The lawsuit started after the 30-S are political. I came from Ecuador to defend my independence, my freedom and I do not believe the judge handling the case (Freddy San Martin). I did not commit a crime deserving twelve years in prison. That day I made no act of force, but to defend freedom of expression.
What proves his innocence?
Employees of state television said I did not commit acts of force against the property of the channel. I tried videos that I was invited to go to the set of interviews ... and at one point broke a glass. That day I called for peace and not to conspire against the regime.
The 30-S was linked to the Patriotic Society ...
They said it was Lucio Gutierrez"s lawyer and friend of Carlos Vera, and it is not. That day does not protest against the government but sympathize with the struggle of the public and the police because they violated rights, as it is done with the freedom of thought, religion and business, rights that can not be ignored by any revolution more communist, socialist or anarchist is.
In cases of assassination and incitement to rebellion was acquitted. Will this be a mitigating factor for you?
There are extenuating circumstances. Trials (the 30-S) are doomed to failure because the government talked about conspiracy, but there was no process for the conspirators.
Why he feels politically persecuted?
Being acquitted (Fidel) and Araujo (Caesar) is the scapegoat Carrion Pablo Guerrero. They already have an acquittal, therefore, are to prosecute the accused (by making) the state channel, who are not terrorists, subversives or criminals.
With the acquittal of Carrion and Araujo fell the thesis that the 30-S was a coup and assassination?
It forced the legal figures because the actions of citizens (30-S) were violations, not crimes. There was a coup but a riot police mishandled, causing several deaths.
Why is he in hiding if it enjoys the replacement of prison?
I left the country before you have a proxy measure, but I know that the repeal and go to jail if they return.
Do you own is self-imposed exile?
I had to make this decision because I have no guarantees of due process.